|XVT? firstname.lastname@example.org (1995-01-23)|
|Re: XVT? email@example.com (1995-01-23)|
|Crossplatform GUI (not again?!) Re: XVT? firstname.lastname@example.org (1995-02-02)|
|From:||email@example.com (Ralf B. Lukner)|
|Organization:||University of Texas at Austin Chemical Engineering|
|Date:||Thu, 2 Feb 1995 06:08:27 GMT|
William Johnson <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>We need to produce educational programs for use on a variety of computer
>platforms. Someone recommended using XVT to develop applications because
email@example.com (Taylor Hutt) wrote:
> The place I work just rejected XVT due to the costly licensing
> arrangment. It was about $17K (yes, K) for the X/Windows license.
Try looking at the following (open location with netscape or mosaic):
Those files summarize/compare portable GUI builders. Based on my
literature search and other info, ILOG Views and Galaxy look like nice
cross-platform tools. I am just beginning the process of in-house eval.
Since my app is mainly for workstations, I am actually seriously
considering Openware's ObjectBuilder/OI. Attractive educational pricing
is available for these tools. For those with limited funding, using
native (single platform) compilers/GUI builders is the best solution IMHO,
but there are many portable GUI options as the file above will attest.
P.S. Note I cross-posted to comp.windows.x.motif where this
cross-platform issue has been addressed several times.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.