|RDP version 1.3 now available firstname.lastname@example.org (1995-01-03)|
|Keywords:||LL(1), tools, available, FTP|
|Date:||Tue, 3 Jan 1995 14:30:49 GMT|
The third maintenance release of RDP (version 1.3) is now available via ftp
from cscx.cs.rhbnc.ac.uk (188.8.131.52) in directory /pub/rdp. Get
rdp1_3.zip if you are an MS-DOS user or rdp1_3.tar if you are a Unix user.
RDP compiles attributed LL(1) grammars decorated with C-language semantic
actions into recursive descent compilers. You will find more details in the
last section of this message. If you would like your name added to a mailing
list which will keep you up to date with RDP developments please mail me at
the address given at the end of this message.
** RDP release version 1.30 flyer. Adrian Johnstone 28 December 1994 **
This is the RDP V1.30 release distribution. To |
install RDP look in the makefile and ensure that the | *
blocks of options at the top are commented out | |
correctly for your compiler and operating system. | / \
Then type 'make' (or 'nmake' if you are a Microsoft | / \
compiler user) and stand well back. | //o\\
| // \\
If you use an ANSI compiler then you should be | /o/ \o\
able to build RDP after you have defined suitable | /// \\\
compiler switch options in the makefile. I'd really | //o \\
like to hear about any problems you have with other | o/// \\\\
MS-DOS or Unix C compilerc. | // / \ o\\
| /o/o/|\o\ \
If you have a non-ANSI compiler, then the following | //////|\\\\o\
parts of the code might cause you problems: | __|__
| | |
1. Several of the data structures use bit fields to | \___/
store flags. You can rework the code to use |
#define'd masks in the traditional way. |
| A MERRY CHRISTMAS
2. As of version 1.3, I am using the ANSI CPU time |
routines to generate usage statistics at the | TO ALL
end of each run. I know that some early versions |
of Turbo-C use a non-ANSI macro to specify the | READERS AND
number of clock ticks per second. You could |
comment out the relevant printf statement if you | AND RDP USERS
can't figure out a fix. |________________________
Further documentation may be found in Postscript form in subdirectory 'rdp_doc'.
I'd like to thank the many people who have tried RDP and sent me encouraging
messages, suggestions for improvements and bug reports, in particular Andy
Betts (previously of UCL, now at Inmos) and my students on course CS347
(Compilers and code generation) at RHUL.
*** Important note ***
I have made the following non-backwards compatible changes at this release:
a) the PRE_PROCESS and POST_PROCESS directives have been renamed PRE_PARSE and
b) the EOF scanner primitive has been removed. EOF is automatically appended
to the start production (as in fact it always was) and
c) the undocumented TEXT_MODE directive has been renamed INTERPRETER
(as threatened in the version 1.2 documentation) although it remains
undocumented and will probably be replaced by a new mechanism in a future
** Improvements in this version include **
NEW FEATURES AND CHANGES
1. The hand written rdp parser has now been removed. The production rdp
executable is built from an rdp generated C source file.
2. Semantic actions may have a `pass expression' appended to them of the form
@n where n is an integer. Such actions will only be executed on pass n.
Actions that do not have a pass expression will be executed on every pass.
3. Inherited attributes are now supported. See the user manual, and examples
of their use in the MPL parser.
4. A new RDP only option -E causes the name of the production detecting an
error to be inserted into generated error messages. This is useful for
debugging error handlers.
5. PRE_PROCESS and POST_PROCESS are now called PRE_PARSE and POST_PARSE
6. Scanner primitive EOF has now been removed. EOF is automatically appended
to the start production (as indeed it always was...)
7. In verbose mode, rdp generated parsers now report the amount of CPU time
8. Call counts are now maintained for all tokens and productions and are
reported along with the first and follow sets in the expanded production
listing switched on by the -e option. Productions that have a call count of
zero generate warning messages, and are not instantiated into the generated
9. The new global variable 'int rdp__error_return' is used to pass an error
value back to the operating system. By default it is zero, but can of course
be set to any other value within your semantic actions.
10. Calls to undeclared productions are now detected syntactically (RDP is now
a 2 pass parser, so as to cope with forward references) rather than during the
grammar checking phase.
11. Doubly declared productions are now detected syntactically.
12. The Toy interpreter has been replaced by an extened Mini interpreter
called MPL. This language illustrates the use of inherited attributes and is
described in a new chapter of the user manual.
13. In the makefile, macro definitions have been added to support
SUN's acc version 2.0 (thanks to Curtis Bartley), GNU C on MS-DOS
(thanks to Mark Simmons) and Microsoft C++ version 7 (thanks to Paul
14. Several parts of the makefile have been tidied up: in particular the
support library object files are now only remade when necessary.
15. Subproductions are reported in null production errors. At version 1.2 I
hid subproduction names, but got a little carried away so that null errors
were always reported against the parent production.
16. The rdp.bnf grammar file actually allowed empty sequences (productions of
the form adrian ::= 'a' | | 'z'. The grammar checking phase would crash as a
result of dereferencing through null pointers generated by these illegal
productions. Empty sequences are now detected syntactically.
17. The new (at version 1.2) error message facility omitted to quote ', " and
\ characters, which caused compile time errors. Thanks to Geoff Lane for
reporting this one.
18. The new (at version 1.2) error message facility incorrectly reported the
contents of the follow set (as opposed to the first set) when an error was
detected during a scan__test_set() call.
19. RDP parsers reported the compilation time of the parent rdp executable
rather than the generation time of the parser.
20. Due to a pointer arithmetic error, RDP was not previously picking up empty
tokens in normal productions, although it did correctly detect empty tokens in
21. Extended keywords such as STRING which only used one extension field were
written out incorrectly in the load_extended_keywords part of the parser. I
don't understand why this has only just come to light: anyway it's fixed now.
22. The comment at the top of the generated header and parser files reported
the name of the output file instead of the name of the source BNF file.
23. A large number of minor changes have been made to the manual, mainly
to correct typos and document new features.
**** Features for future versions
Version 2.00 will support scanner productions which supersede the various
programmable tokens used at the moment. RDP will then write out a customised
scanner for each language in exactly the same way that it currently writes out
parsers. These generated scanners will look just like the existing scanner
(i.e. they will NOT be DFA based) so that they can be debugged easily. A set
of scanner productions roughly equivalent to the current scanner will be
Version 2.00 will also offer some new grammar writing tools. In particular, I
intend to enhance the < > construct so as to allow specification of maximum
and minimum iteration counts, and redefine all other constructs in terms of
this new mechanism, I also hope to support permutation phrases, as described
in a recent edition of LOPLAS.
The set package will be enhanced to support sets which dynamically grow. At
the moment, all sets allocate the same amount of memory, which can be very
wasteful if your application needs large sets.
Perhaps at V2.00, you will be able to selectively allow backtracking so
allowing LL(k) grammars to be parsed. If you need this a lot you should be
looking at PCCTS or PRECC not RDP.
Other suggestions for improvements are welcome.
As you may have gathered, RDP V2.00 will be a major rewrite, so don't expect
much until the Spring of 1995.
Finally (surprise, surprise) a textbook on code generation for modern
processors, using RDP to construct the compiler front ends, will appear
eventually. Anybody interested in beta-testing the book might like to get in
touch, but we're not expecting to make much progress on it until early Summer
**** Here follows a thumbnail sketch of RDP ****
RDP - a recursive descent parser generator
RDP compiles attributed LL(1) grammars decorated with C-language semantic
actions into recursive descent compilers. RDP is written in strict ANSI C and
produces strict ANSI C. RDP was developed using Borland C 3.1 on a PC and has
also been built with no problems on Alpha/OSF-1, DECstation/Ultrix Sun 4/SunOS
and NetBSD 0.9 hosts all using GCC. The definition of strict ANSI here means
gcc -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -fno-common -Wall -ansi -pedantic
and getting no warning messages.
RDP also compiles with Borland Turbo-C and Microsoft C.
RDP is C++ `clean' i.e. there are no identifiers used that clash with C++
reserved words. RDP generated code has been used with g++ applications, and
compiles with g++ and the Borland C++ (as opposed to ANSI) compiler.
RDP itself and the language processors it generates use standard symbol, set
and scanner modules. The RDP scanner is programmed by loading tokens into the
symbol table at the start of each run. In principle, the RDP scanner can be
used to support runtime extensible languages, such as user defined operators
in Algol-68, although nobody has had the nerve to try this yet.
RDP produces complete runnable programs with built-in help information and
command line switches that are specified as part of the EBNF file. In this
sense RDP output is far more shrink-wrapped than the usual parser generators
which helps beginning students. RDP generates itself (you mean you use a
parser generator which _isn't_ written in itself?) which is a nice
demonstration of the bootstrapping technique used for porting compilers to new
I wrote RDP because in October '94 I started giving a course on compiler
design. I don't think the world needs another course on parsing techniques and
am really interested in code generation for exotic processors, so I tried to
produce a compact parser generator that would enable undergraduates to rip
through the syntax and standard code generation parts of the syllabus in a few
weeks, thus leaving me time to get into the black arts of code scheduling and
What you get.
o An implementation of Pascal style set-handling in C.
o A hash-coded symbol table with support for scoping and arbitrary user data.
o A programmable high-speed scanner with integrated error handling and
hooks for macros (RDP is being used to generate assemblers for two novel
microprocessors in addition to the usual applications of LL(1) parsers).
o The machine generated source for the RDP translator. RDP checks that
the source grammar is LL(1) and explains exactly why a non-LL(1) grammar
is unacceptable. RDP does not attempt to rework a grammar by itself.
o The decorated EBNF file describing RDP that was processed by the RDP
executable to produce its own source code. This is good for boggling
undergraduate's minds with.
o A decorated EBNF file describing an interpreter for a language called MPL.
o An EBNF file describing Pascal which generates a parser for the Pascal
o A pre-built RDP executable for MS-DOS.
o Sources, makefiles and Borland 3.1 project files for everything which
you may use freely on condition that you send copies of any modifications,
enhancements and ill-conceived changes you might make back to me so that
I can improve RDP.
What you don't get.
o Tutorial information on parsing and compiling (try Wirth's Algorithms +
Data Structures = Programs, Chapter 5 or your favourite compiler book).
Maybe one day there'll be a book by me. In a future release I will include
the slides and notes from my compilers course.
o Warranties. This code has only just escaped from my personal toolkit.
I've put a lot of effort into making it fit for others to use, but in
the very nature of compiler compilers it is hard to test all the angles,
and the Garbage In - Garbage Out principle holds to the highest degree:
if you write ill-formed semantic actions you won't find out until you try
and compile the parser that RDP wrote for you. On the plus side, RDP has
now been used pretty ferociously by lots of people and has stood up very
well. It does seem to be pretty stable, and I will continue to respond to
Comments, queries and requests for code to
Smail: Dr Adrian Johnstone, Dean of Science, Computer Science Department,
Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.
Email: email@example.com Tel: +44 (0)1784 443425 Fax: +44 (0)1784 443420
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.