| Related articles |
|---|
| Prolog to AGP-L compiler ? tkoyt@theseas.ntua.gr (1994-08-02) |
| Re: Prolog to AGP-L compiler ? johnm@cory.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (1994-08-03) |
| Re: Prolog to AGP-L compiler ? buyukisik_o_f@ae.ge.com (U-E59264-Osman Buyukisik) (1994-08-03) |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| From: | johnm@cory.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (John D. Mitchell) |
| Keywords: | prolog, parse, tools |
| Organization: | University of California, Berkeley |
| References: | 94-08-027 |
| Date: | Wed, 3 Aug 1994 03:11:46 GMT |
| Status: | RO |
Tasos <tkoyt@theseas.ntua.gr> wrote:
[...]
>The second problem that we face is really a dillema. We have been told
>about Sorcerer (from Purdue univ.) and that it should be a fine tool to
>use for our project. Although I got some information about it, I am not so
>sure that this is what we want and whether it can manage language like
>Prolog. Has anyone heard about it, or even better used it? What about
>ANTLR?
Hop over to the comp.compilers.tools.pccts newsgroup for discussion on
PCCTS (the Purdue Compiler Construction ToolSet), DLG, ANTLR, and/or
Sorcerer. The author of ANTLR and Sorcerer as well as a number of users
are pretty active on that newsgroup.
My only worry about whether or not Sorcerer will work for you has to do
with Prolog language specific things which I know far too little about.
Hope this helps,
John
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.