|Prolog to AGP-L compiler ? firstname.lastname@example.org (1994-08-02)|
|Re: Prolog to AGP-L compiler ? johnm@cory.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (1994-08-03)|
|Re: Prolog to AGP-L compiler ? email@example.com (U-E59264-Osman Buyukisik) (1994-08-03)|
|From:||johnm@cory.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (John D. Mitchell)|
|Keywords:||prolog, parse, tools|
|Organization:||University of California, Berkeley|
|Date:||Wed, 3 Aug 1994 03:11:46 GMT|
Tasos <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>The second problem that we face is really a dillema. We have been told
>about Sorcerer (from Purdue univ.) and that it should be a fine tool to
>use for our project. Although I got some information about it, I am not so
>sure that this is what we want and whether it can manage language like
>Prolog. Has anyone heard about it, or even better used it? What about
Hop over to the comp.compilers.tools.pccts newsgroup for discussion on
PCCTS (the Purdue Compiler Construction ToolSet), DLG, ANTLR, and/or
Sorcerer. The author of ANTLR and Sorcerer as well as a number of users
are pretty active on that newsgroup.
My only worry about whether or not Sorcerer will work for you has to do
with Prolog language specific things which I know far too little about.
Hope this helps,
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.