|P-Code and virtual machines firstname.lastname@example.org (1994-03-23)|
|Re: P-Code and virtual machines email@example.com (1994-03-25)|
|Re: P-Code and virtual machines firstname.lastname@example.org (1994-03-28)|
|Re: P-Code and virtual machines email@example.com) (1994-04-05)|
|Re: P-Code and virtual machines firstname.lastname@example.org (1994-04-08)|
|From:||email@example.com (Larry Rau (Migration Software))|
|Date:||Tue, 5 Apr 1994 21:26:26 GMT|
> procedural language? I have experience with stack machines and they
> seem inappropriate for e.g., C.]
Isn't the AT&T chip a stack architecture! It was designed to run C
programs after much analysis of C programs. It was determined that C
programs relied on function calls enough that implementing a stack
machine with a large number of registers dedicated to acting like a
stack would improve performance.
I read an article about the Hobbit chip a while back, am I wrong on
this? Anyone have real experience on the Hobbit?
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.