|Rewriting as a means for translating firstname.lastname@example.org (1994-02-04)|
|Re: Rewriting as a means for translating email@example.com (1994-02-07)|
|Re: Rewriting as a means for translating firstname.lastname@example.org (Terence Parr) (1994-02-08)|
|From:||email@example.com (Joachim Schrod)|
|Organization:||TH Darmstadt, FG Systemprogrammierung|
|Date:||Mon, 7 Feb 1994 14:15:57 GMT|
firstname.lastname@example.org (Henry G. Baker) writes:
> In my experience, the idea of source-to-source translation by means of
> a simple rewriting system is always a loser. No matter how close the
> languages seem, there are always significant "gotchas".
I agree with you, but how do you find the idea of Terence Parr to use
a high-level specification of tree transformations?
It's described in his paper ``An Overview of SORCERER: A Simple
Available by anonymous ftp from the PCCTS archive
marvin.ecn.purdue.edu:/pub/pccts. European folks might want to use the
At least, I'm still waiting for the release of the SORCERER source...
Joachim Schrod Email: email@example.com
Computer Science Department
Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.