|[2 earlier articles]|
|Re: Debuggers harvard!rutgers!spam!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!decvax!vir (1987-03-15)|
|Re: Debuggers decvax!decwrl!mips!himel (1987-03-23)|
|Debuggers email@example.com (1991-08-08)|
|How long does it take to build a compiler? firstname.lastname@example.org (Youngwhan Lee) (1993-10-27)|
|Re: How long does it take to build a compiler? email@example.com (1993-11-10)|
|Re: debuggers firstname.lastname@example.org (1993-11-11)|
|Re: debuggers email@example.com (1993-11-11)|
|Re: debuggers firstname.lastname@example.org (1993-11-11)|
|debuggers email@example.com (1993-11-11)|
|Re: debuggers firstname.lastname@example.org (1993-11-11)|
|Re: debuggers sean@PICARD.TAMU.EDU (1993-11-12)|
|Re: debuggers email@example.com (1993-11-14)|
|Re: debuggers firstname.lastname@example.org (1993-11-15)|
|From:||email@example.com (Shyamal Prasad)|
|Organization:||SMU - School of Engineering & Applied Science - Dallas|
|Date:||Thu, 11 Nov 1993 01:19:07 GMT|
firstname.lastname@example.org (Bill Maniatty) writes:
>One beef that I have with most debuggers I use (gdb, sdb, dbx, ...) is
>that on most workstations under unix, the debuggers do NOT use hardware
>defined break points, so that I cannot set watch on a data location.
gdb on running on a DEC Station 5000 under ULTRIX allows watch points.
However, it does *not* use the hardware and runs about 10 to a 100
I have used them one time when I was really sunk...they *do* work. I
don't know about sdb/dbx though.
I hope I have not repeated the obvious :-)
Shyamal Prasad, Department of Computer Science
Southern Methodist University, Dallas TX 75275, USA
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.