|[6 earlier articles]|
|Re: Code quality firstname.lastname@example.org (1993-01-07)|
|Re: Code quality email@example.com (1993-01-07)|
|Re: Code quality firstname.lastname@example.org (1993-01-07)|
|Re: Code quality grover@brahmand.Eng.Sun.COM (1993-01-07)|
|Re: Code quality email@example.com (1993-01-08)|
|Re: Code quality polstra!jdp@uunet.UU.NET (1993-01-12)|
|Re: Code quality firstname.lastname@example.org (1993-01-13)|
|Re: Code quality email@example.com (1993-01-25)|
|Re: Code quality firstname.lastname@example.org (1993-02-01)|
|From:||email@example.com (Stan Shebs)|
|Organization:||Apple Computer Inc.|
|Date:||Wed, 13 Jan 1993 19:34:16 GMT|
firstname.lastname@example.org (Dale R. Worley) writes:
> Is there much of a market for another 10% in speed of generated code?
John Polstra wrote:
> On the other hand, they couldn't care less about speed of compilation.
An apropos quote heard from a system software person recently, talking
about the Mac system software:
"I need the code to be as fast and small as possible, I don't care if it
takes the Cray a month to produce it"
<BTW, snide remarks about Mac performance will be heartily agreed with!>
Apple ATG System Software
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.