|Why is compiled basic slower than C? (Basic is the future) Glenn_Johansson@f313.n203.z2.fidonet.cd.chalmers.s (1992-08-11)|
|Re: Why is compiled basic slower than C firstname.lastname@example.org (Diomidis Spinellis) (1992-08-12)|
|From:||Diomidis Spinellis <email@example.com>|
|Date:||Wed, 12 Aug 1992 12:12:03 GMT|
|Keywords:||Basic, C, performance|
BASIC has many features that are inherently slow. Comparable programs
written in C do not rely on such features, and therefore, generate faster
code. The most important features of BASIC that result to slow code are:
1. All numeric computations are done in floating point by default.
One must explicitly name a variable with a special integer suffix
code, to declare it as an integer.
2. String operations rely on the dynamic memory allocation and
garbage collection. Both are slower than the staticaly
allocated string memory / programer controlled allocation and
disposal schemes that C programmers use.
Furthermore, in PC environments, C programs often directly control the
hardware of the output devices (e.g. screen) by using pointers to the
memory associated with them (e.g. screen buffer). The same operation can
be expressed in BASIC only in a more roundabout way (usualy through a POKE
operation) and will therefore be slower.
Diomidis Spinellis Internet: <firstname.lastname@example.org> UUCP: ...!uknet!icdoc!dds
Department of Computing, Imperial College, London SW7
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.