| Related articles |
|---|
| Common subexpression analysis (summary) mernst@theory.lcs.mit.edu (1992-06-26) |
| Re: Common subexpression analysis (summary) buzzard@eng.umd.edu (1992-07-07) |
| Re: Common subexpression analysis (summary) Bruce.Hoult@bbs.actrix.gen.nz (1992-07-13) |
| Re: Common subexpression analysis (summary) igor!voltaire!davidm@uunet.UU.NET (1992-07-13) |
| Re: Common subexpression analysis (summary) Dik.Winter@cwi.nl (1992-07-13) |
| Re: Common subexpression analysis (summary) preston@dawn.cs.rice.edu (1992-07-12) |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| From: | igor!voltaire!davidm@uunet.UU.NET (David Moore) |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| Date: | Mon, 13 Jul 1992 17:20:28 GMT |
| References: | 92-06-135 92-07-021 |
| Keywords: | optimize |
buzzard@eng.umd.edu (Sean Barrett) writes:
>Recently I noticed a cute little optimization thing; [slightly
>complicated example follows]
A simpler example of where this is useful is in a common
Fortran idiom for finding a maximum in an array:
j=1
do i=1,N
if(a(i).gt.a(j))j=i
end do
Knowledgable Fortran programmers will put the comparison value
in a scalar, but I have seen this code in some benchmarks which
are said to be taken from real code.
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.