|Interpreter. What is the best way ? email@example.com (1991-11-14)|
|Re: Interpreter. What is the best way ? firstname.lastname@example.org (1991-11-14)|
|Re: Interpreter. What is the best way ? email@example.com (1991-11-16)|
|From:||firstname.lastname@example.org (Joshua Levy)|
|Date:||Sat, 16 Nov 1991 03:32:34 GMT|
email@example.com (Gavin Thomas Nicol) writes:
> I'm not sure if this is a question that really fits here, but I am have
>started to write an application extension language,
I would seriously look at TCL, before implementing my own application
extension language. TCL 6.1 just got posted to one of the source groups
(comp.sources.misc, I think). I have used 4.something and 6.0. TCL is
designed to be an extension language, and to be easily extendable. IMHO
it succeeds in both goals.
Its syntax is a little more complicated than C or PASCAL, but I would still
recommend at least looking at it before writing your own from scratch.
Joshua Levy (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.