|Modula-3 on TOPS-10/20? firstname.lastname@example.org (1991-08-17)|
|Re: Modula-3 on TOPS-10/20? muller@Pa.dec.com (1991-08-20)|
|Re: Modula-3 on TOPS-10/20? email@example.com (1991-08-22)|
|From:||muller@Pa.dec.com (Eric Muller)|
|Organization:||DEC Systems Research Center|
|Date:||Tue, 20 Aug 91 17:51:15 PDT|
In article 91-08-077, firstname.lastname@example.org (Horace B Jones) writes:
> Has anyone tried getting SRC Modula-3 ported to a TOPS-10 or TOPS-20
> environment? It appears that it would be a pretty formidable task
> involving LINK as well as compiler technology. But I have to ask
> in case anyone is trying this. Thanks.
The real problem today is that we are really assuming a bsd-like
machine. The situation should be improved with 2.0, where we won't
use symbolic links (this will help a lot for System V). Another gray
area is the thead emulation; but since this is really an OS problem,
I suppose that we should provide an alternate implementation which is
simpler to port, but does not offer the full thread functionality (no
preemptive scheduling, may be no threads at all).
I am not too worried about the compiler/linker part. Using C isolates
us a lot from machine characteristics. Of course, we have never tried
36 bits machines and we may have some surprises. By the way, what is
sizeof (int) ? and the number of bits in a char ?
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.