|Compilers 2000 firstname.lastname@example.org (Jeff Prothero) (1990-09-28)|
|Re: Compilers 2000 email@example.com (1990-10-02)|
|Re: Compilers 2000 firstname.lastname@example.org (1990-10-06)|
|Re: Compilers 2000 email@example.com (1990-10-07)|
|From:||Jeff Prothero <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Fri, 28 Sep 90 18:05:35 -0700|
comp.arch has no shortage of prognostications as to what is Right and Wrong
with hardware today, and what hardware will be like in ten or twenty years.
Anyone (John? Preston? Peter? ...) want to offer comments on what is Right
and Wrong with the compiler field today, and what compilers will look like
ten or twenty years from now?
Problems posed by coming architectures.
Opportunities posed by coming architectures..
How mature are the theoretical foundations of the compiler field?
Will compiler papers ever reference computer algebra papers?
Can declarative languages ever displace imperative ones? Should they? Does
this primarily depend on the presence / absence of needed compiler
- Jeff Prothero (email@example.com)
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.