|Re: Algol, and language design firstname.lastname@example.org (1990-08-06)|
|Re: Algol, and language design rwh@PROOF.ERGO.CS.CMU.EDU (1990-08-07)|
|From:||email@example.com (Lawrence D'Oliveiro, Waikato University)|
|Organization:||University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand|
|References:||<firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <1990Jul26.firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Mon, 06 Aug 90 18:51:14 GMT|
Has anybody else noticed that call-by-name makes a certain amount of
sense when you're expanding routine calls in-line?
Think of macros that expand to generated code (or perhaps some
intermediate form thereof), as opposed to more source code.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro fone: +64-71-562-889
Computer Services Dept fax: +64-71-384-066
University of Waikato electric mail: email@example.com
Hamilton, New Zealand 37^ 47' 26" S, 175^ 19' 7" E, GMT+12:00
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.