Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | pardo@cs.washington.edu (David Keppel) |
References: | <1990Jun4.044255.14857@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us> <1990Jun1.194941.5781@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us> <1990Jun4.212226.18389@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us> |
Date: | Tue, 5 Jun 90 17:33:32 GMT |
Organization: | University of Washington, Computer Science, Seattle |
Keywords: | optimize |
larus@spool.cs.wisc.edu writes:
>[Some programmers are willing to throw away some of
> their sequential semantics in order to get processing power.]
In which case you're no longer compiling the same language. The point
that I would like to make is that such things are *language extensions*
and not *compiler optimizations*.
;-D on ( Language retractions? ) Pardo
--
pardo@cs.washington.edu
{rutgers,cornell,ucsd,ubc-cs,tektronix}!uw-beaver!june!pardo
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.