Re: Unsafe Optimizations (WAS: Compiler Design in C How about it?)

larus@spool.cs.wisc.edu writes:
>[Some programmers are willing to throw away some of
> their sequential semantics in order to get processing power.]


In which case you're no longer compiling the same language. The point
that I would like to make is that such things are *language extensions*
and not *compiler optimizations*.


;-D on ( Language retractions? ) Pardo
--
pardo@cs.washington.edu
        {rutgers,cornell,ucsd,ubc-cs,tektronix}!uw-beaver!june!pardo
--

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.