|References for "atypical" compilers. email@example.com (1990-02-26)|
|Re: References for "atypical" compilers. unknown (1990-02-27)|
|Re: References for "atypical" compilers. firstname.lastname@example.org (1990-03-03)|
|From:||email@example.com (Perry Schmidt)|
|Date:||26 Feb 90 06:48:30 GMT|
|References:||<firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <11112@encore.Encore.COM> <firstname.lastname@example.org.EDU> <2027@osc.COM> <email@example.com> <2054@osc.COM> <1990Feb21.firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Organization:||U of Wisconsin CS Dept|
Does anyone have good references to "atypical" compilers. Specifically
Prolog and LISP. (More interested in Prolog, especially code generation
I know this was asked before, but of course at that time I wasn't interested.
(Sorry for the repeat)
[If someone has a bibliography on this topic, I'd love to see it. There are
lots of compilers for Lisp and its ilk, but I haven't seen references to them
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.