Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| Array accesses are boring johnl@taugh.com (John R Levine) (2024-03-06) |
| Re: Array accesses are boring fw@deneb.enyo.de (Florian Weimer) (2024-03-15) |
| From: | Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | Fri, 15 Mar 2024 21:50:13 +0100 |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| References: | 24-03-001 |
| Injection-Info: | gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="29784"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
| Keywords: | Java, comment |
| Posted-Date: | 16 Mar 2024 21:35:12 EDT |
* John R. Levine:
> They instrumented a large set of Java benchmarks to look at the array
> accesses, over 3 billion of them in total. The majority fell into five
> simple access patterns. See the pictures on page 8 of the PDF.
>
> https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02416
It's strange that they observed array lengths changing at the JVM
bytecode level. That shouldn't happen.
[Different sizes on different calls to the routine? -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.