Re: HOPL (History of Programming Languages)

On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:33:30 +0800
Bugmagnet <bugmagnet@outlook.com> wrote:


> As many of you are aware, HOPL has been revived. Instead of being at
> <http://hopl.murdoch.edu.au/> it is now at <http://hopl.info>. It also
> has a presence at
> <https://www.facebook.com/HistoryOfProgrammingLanguages/>.
>


Also we are actively seeking further acquisitions. I have written
directly to a number of language authors, however I'm quite likely to
miss many. Therefore, could language authors please check hopl.info and
write to hopl DOT acquisitions AT gmail DOT com with new material or
with updates to existing material.


In both cases please respond according to the following headings (see
the entries for AmbientTalk etc at
https://www.facebook.com/HistoryOfProgrammingLanguages/ as an example)




* Required
Email address *


Name of language *


Name/s of designer/s, developer/s *


Email address of submitter *


Country of origin *
The country in which the language was developed


Main website for language *


Year language development began *


Year language published *
The year the language was made publicly available for use


Known influences on language design *


What other languages influenced the development of this language


Description of language *


Peer-reviewed publications (journals or conference papers)


On-line documentation link/s


Historical notes


Other notes of interest related to language development, contact with
other developers etc.


HOPL language classification
See HOPL's "Polychotomous key for the classification of programming
languages" http://hopl.info/polykey.html


Approximate size and composition of user community Does a community of
language users exist? How many are there, approximately? What kind of
people/companies/institutions use the language?






Thanks in advance,
Bruce Axtens, Librarian

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.