Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux?

arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins)
Wed, 14 Sep 2016 18:14:22 -0000 (UTC)

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[9 earlier articles]
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? 221-501-9011@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2016-09-06)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? bc@freeuk.com (BartC) (2016-09-06)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? rockbrentwood@gmail.com (2016-09-07)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? arnold@skeeve.com (2016-09-12)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? bc@freeuk.com (BartC) (2016-09-12)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? arnold@skeeve.com (2016-09-13)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? arnold@skeeve.com (2016-09-14)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? rugxulo@gmail.com (2016-09-26)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? arnold@skeeve.com (2016-09-27)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? rugxulo@gmail.com (2016-09-27)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2016-09-28)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? bc@freeuk.com (BartC) (2016-09-28)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2016-09-28)
[11 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 18:14:22 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
References: 16-09-001 16-09-026 16-09-028 16-09-030
Injection-Info: miucha.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="31927"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords: C, performance, comment
Posted-Date: 14 Sep 2016 21:31:40 EDT



>BartC <bc@freeuk.com> wrote:
>>Do you use TCC to compile itself, or something like gcc?
>>
>>I'm just interested in whether it partly relies on gcc to get its speed!


Aharon Robbins <arnold@skeeve.com> wrote:
>The default configure + make compiles tcc with gcc.


I should point out that a large part of tcc's speed comes from the
fact that it generates object code directly, instead of going
through the assembler. It might even have its own internal 'ld',
I'm not sure.
--
Aharon (Arnold) Robbins arnold AT skeeve DOT com
[Oh, like WATFOR and the original Dartmough BASIC. -John]


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.