Re: Is multi-level function return possible?

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Mon, 07 Apr 2014 14:48:57 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[30 earlier articles]
Re: Is multi-level function return possible? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2014-03-24)
Re: Is multi-level function return possible? gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2014-03-26)
Re: Is multi-level function return possible? news@cuboid.co.uk (Andy Walker) (2014-03-26)
Re: Is multi-level function return possible? news@cuboid.co.uk (Andy Walker) (2014-03-26)
Re: Is multi-level function return possible? federation2005@netzero.com (2014-03-26)
Re: Is multi-level function return possible? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2014-03-27)
Re: Is multi-level function return possible? monnier@iro.umontreal.ca (Stefan Monnier) (2014-04-07)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 14:48:57 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
References: 14-03-020 14-03-022 14-03-025 14-03-030 14-03-044 14-03-046 14-03-047 14-03-048 14-03-053 14-03-057 14-03-060 14-03-067
Keywords: design, history
Posted-Date: 07 Apr 2014 23:38:37 EDT

> Many years ago I found a funny implementation of local variables in
> GfA-Basic.
[ Describes the mechanism used, e.g. in Emacs. ]


This gives you dynamic scoping: no closures.




                Stefan


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.