Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| Does someone have a reference to the statement that almost all practic cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2012-05-30) |
| Does someone have a reference to the statement that almost all practic Sylvain.Schmitz@lsv.ens-cachan.fr (Sylvain Schmitz) (2012-05-30) |
| From: | Chris F Clark <cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | Wed, 30 May 2012 13:27:11 -0400 |
| Organization: | The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA |
| Keywords: | LL(1), question |
| Posted-Date: | 30 May 2012 14:52:31 EDT |
I'm writing up a small whitepaper(*) where I want to discuss LL and LR
grammars. In it I want to sidestep the issue of the fact that there
are LL grammars that are not LR and vice-versa. Thus, I simply want
to quote the conventional wisdom, i.e. that nearly any (artificial)
language in use has an LL grammar. However, I'd like to reference
someone else who has made that statement, so that it simply isn't a
bald assertion without proof in my paper. It's instead a reference to
a bald assertion without proof in someone else's paper (or web page or
interview or whatever) ;-)
With lesser importance, I wouldn't mind a reference to a proof that
all deterministic context free langauges have an LR(1) grammar.
However, since I know that is a proven statement, I'm a little less
worried about it.
-Chris
******************************************************************************
Chris Clark email: christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com
Compiler Resources, Inc. Web Site: http://world.std.com/~compres
23 Bailey Rd voice: (508) 435-5016
Berlin, MA 01503 USA twitter: @intel_chris
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.