Re: Language Design

Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com>
Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:22:54 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[4 earlier articles]
Re: Language Design zwinkau@kit.edu (Andreas Zwinkau) (2011-07-20)
Re: Language Design acolvin@efunct.com (mac) (2011-07-23)
Re: Language Design christophe.de.dinechin@gmail.com (Christophe de Dinechin) (2011-07-23)
Re: Language Design osesov@gmail.com (Oleg Sesov) (2011-07-23)
Re: Language Design gene.ressler@gmail.com (Gene) (2011-07-26)
Re: Language Design thomas.mertes@gmx.at (tm) (2011-07-27)
Re: Language Design usenet@rwaltman.com (Roberto Waltman) (2011-07-28)
Re: Language Design s_dubrovich@yahoo.com (s_dubrovich@yahoo.com) (2011-08-04)
Re: Language Design torbenm@diku.dk (2011-08-08)
Language design David.Chase@Eng.Sun.COM (1991-09-04)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:22:54 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 11-07-027 11-07-038
Keywords: history
Posted-Date: 31 Jul 2011 12:36:59 EDT

Gene wrote:
>The old Turbo Pascal 2.0 dialect was pretty remarkable. There was a
>version for Z80 (CP/M) and 8086 (MSDOS). I think the whole compiler
>was only 50K or so.


The CPM 3.0 version was 31K - As you said, remarkable.
(Available here: http://www.retroarchive.org/cpm/lang/lang.htm )


--
Roberto Waltman

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.