Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design.

Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:16:18 -0700 (PDT)

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. nospam@sonic.net (Mark Thorson) (2011-07-18)
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. already5chosen@yahoo.com (Michael S) (2011-07-19)
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. plano.net@aquaporin4.com (Charles Richmond) (2011-07-20)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.arch,comp.compilers,alt.folklore.computers
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: Compilers Central
References: <vbhu17tqe8f03a9i8tar3kpoirg02l8iuj@4ax.com> <989ajaF4u9U1@mid.individual.net>
Keywords: history, RPG
Posted-Date: 23 Jul 2011 02:38:32 EDT

On Jul 15, 1:57 am, Andrew Reilly <areilly...@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:37:53 -0400, Roberto Waltman wrote:
> > Recently I've become (very) interested in Wirth's Lilith/Modula-2
> > workstation, which leads me to ask:
>
> > What other systems were developed in a similar fashion?
>
> > That is, to support mainly one language with the language guiding the
> > architectural design.
>
> Bit of a stretch, perhaps: the AS-400 series of minis vs ?Cobol? ?PL/1?
>


RPG.
Never touched AS/400 myself. From what I heard from friends back in
early 90s, RPG was considered the HLL of choice on this machines.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.