|Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. email@example.com (Mark Thorson) (2011-07-18)|
|Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. firstname.lastname@example.org (Michael S) (2011-07-19)|
|Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. email@example.com (Charles Richmond) (2011-07-20)|
|From:||Michael S <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:16:18 -0700 (PDT)|
|Posted-Date:||23 Jul 2011 02:38:32 EDT|
On Jul 15, 1:57 am, Andrew Reilly <areilly...@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:37:53 -0400, Roberto Waltman wrote:
> > Recently I've become (very) interested in Wirth's Lilith/Modula-2
> > workstation, which leads me to ask:
> > What other systems were developed in a similar fashion?
> > That is, to support mainly one language with the language guiding the
> > architectural design.
> Bit of a stretch, perhaps: the AS-400 series of minis vs ?Cobol? ?PL/1?
Never touched AS/400 myself. From what I heard from friends back in
early 90s, RPG was considered the HLL of choice on this machines.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.