|Compiling C++ Templates as opposed to Preprocessing them. email@example.com (Seima Rao) (2010-07-27)|
|Re: Compiling C++ Templates as opposed to Preprocessing them. firstname.lastname@example.org (mac) (2010-07-31)|
|Re: Compiling C++ Templates as opposed to Preprocessing them. email@example.com (Kenneth 'Bessarion' Boyd) (2010-08-16)|
|Date:||Sat, 31 Jul 2010 01:52:26 +0000 (UTC)|
|Organization:||A noiseless patient Spider|
|Keywords:||C++, debug, question|
|Posted-Date:||31 Jul 2010 16:50:08 EDT|
Seima Rao <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Can readers of this forum advise on whether it would be
> fruitful to consider compiling C++ templates
A follow-on question (or rant):
Is there trace/debug support for templates. The last time I wrote one
there were plenty of "how did I get *that*"? Debugging consisted of
manually emulating the compiler - nof easy in C++.
Another issue was the awful error reporting. Any error message involving
strings was several lines long, beginning with the fully expanded
I haven't used C++ lately, so I hope things have improved.
mac the naC/f
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.