Related articles |
---|
Designing a calling convention for a Lisp->C compiler msimoni@gmail.com (Manuel) (2010-06-03) |
Re: Designing a calling convention for a Lisp->C compiler marc@lithia.nl (Marc van Lieshout) (2010-06-03) |
Re: Designing a calling convention for a Lisp->C compiler kym@sdf.lonestar.org (russell kym horsell) (2010-06-04) |
Re: Designing a calling convention for a Lisp->C compiler kym@sdf.lonestar.org (russell kym horsell) (2010-06-06) |
Re: Designing a calling convention for a Lisp->C compiler cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB / cr88192) (2010-06-06) |
Re: Designing a calling convention for a Lisp->C compiler comp.compilers@inglorion.net (Robbert Haarman) (2010-06-07) |
Re: Designing a calling convention for a Lisp->C compiler gene.ressler@gmail.com (Gene) (2010-06-06) |
From: | russell kym horsell <kym@sdf.lonestar.org> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Sun, 6 Jun 2010 05:58:46 +0000 (UTC) |
Organization: | Netfront http://www.netfront.net/ |
References: | 10-06-008 10-06-010 |
Keywords: | Lisp, C, translator |
Posted-Date: | 06 Jun 2010 17:00:43 EDT |
russell kym horsell <kym@sdf.lonestar.org> wrote:
...
> Good luck. :)
> [I dunno. People have been compiling Lisp into machine code quite
> successfully since the mid 1960s. -John]
I'm talking about a relatively complete and efficient method of
handling lambda expressions rather than either ignoring the problem or
resorting to passing off nontrivial cases to an "eval" (interpreter)
in the runtime system.
Anyone interested can consult Lispkit lisp (c1980) et al or later.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.