| Related articles |
|---|
| Using FORTH as target machine? mailings@jmksf.com (mailings@jmksf.com) (2009-07-22) |
| Re: Using FORTH as target machine? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2009-07-25) |
| Re: Using FORTH as target machine? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB / cr88192) (2009-07-25) |
| Re: Using FORTH as target machine? blog@rivadpm.com (alextangent) (2009-07-26) |
| Re: Using FORTH as target machine? blog@rivadpm.com (alextangent) (2009-07-26) |
| Re: Using FORTH as target machine? joevans@gmail.com (Jason Evans) (2009-07-27) |
| Re: Using FORTH as target machine? pjk@bcs.org.uk (Peter Knaggs) (2009-07-28) |
| Re: Using FORTH as target machine? akk@nospam.org (Andreas) (2009-07-28) |
| [2 later articles] |
| From: | Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | Sat, 25 Jul 2009 07:55:41 +0200 |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| References: | 09-07-080 |
| Keywords: | forth |
| Posted-Date: | 26 Jul 2009 17:42:54 EDT |
mailings@jmksf.com schrieb:
> While crawling the web, I was unable to find out a compiler that uses
> Forth as its target language.
Forth is quite different from other languages. The typical
implementation were a translator for the source language, written in
Forth itself. IIRC there exist tiny-C compilers/interpreters written in
Forth.
DoDi
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.