Re: compiler back-end development?

jacob navia <jacob@nospam.org>
Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:38:59 +0200

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
compiler back-end development? madeeha@gmail.com (mj) (2009-07-10)
Re: compiler back-end development? cmeerw@cmeerw.org (Christof Meerwald) (2009-07-11)
Re: compiler back-end development? tc@cs.bath.ac.uk (Tom Crick) (2009-07-11)
Re: compiler back-end development? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB / cr88192) (2009-07-12)
Re: compiler back-end development? jacob@nospam.org (jacob navia) (2009-07-13)
Re: compiler back-end development? ian@airs.com (Ian Lance Taylor) (2009-07-13)
Re: compiler back-end development? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB) (2009-07-13)
Re: compiler back-end development? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB / cr88192) (2009-07-14)
Re: compiler back-end development? rogers.email@gmail.com (Ian Rogers) (2009-07-14)
Re: compiler back-end development? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB / cr88192) (2009-07-14)
Re: compiler back-end development? toby@telegraphics.com.au (toby) (2009-07-15)
[2 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: jacob navia <jacob@nospam.org>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:38:59 +0200
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
References: 09-07-013 09-07-015 09-07-020
Keywords: GCC, lcc
Posted-Date: 14 Jul 2009 09:36:01 EDT

BGB / cr88192 wrote:
>
> but, yes, it would be better to have GCC working, but for now I have ended
> up using MSVC as my backend (static) compiler (when doing 64-bit stuff...).
>


lcc-win64 has 64 bit support.



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.