|Compiler Design + feedback firstname.lastname@example.org (Philip Herron) (2009-04-21)|
|Re: Compiler Design + feedback cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2009-04-21)|
|Re: Compiler Design + feedback email@example.com (Philip Herron) (2009-04-22)|
|Re: PCC, was Compiler Design + feedback firstname.lastname@example.org (Jonathan Thornburg) (2009-04-25)|
|Re: PCC, was Compiler Design + feedback email@example.com (toby) (2009-05-10)|
|Re: PCC, was Compiler Design + feedback firstname.lastname@example.org (Marco van de Voort) (2009-05-12)|
|Re: PCC, was Compiler Design + feedback nmh@T3X.ORG (Nils M Holm) (2009-05-12)|
|Date:||Sun, 10 May 2009 23:03:51 -0700 (PDT)|
|References:||09-04-044 09-04-046 09-04-048 09-04-063|
|Posted-Date:||12 May 2009 05:05:45 EDT|
On Apr 25, 1:36 pm, "Jonathan Thornburg" <jth...@astro.indiana.edu>
> Philip Herron <herron.phi...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > But i was also wondering are there any 'young' compiler projects. As
> > in ones less mature and easier to get involved in rather than gcc. It
> > might give me more experience to be able to learn more.
> Anders Magnusson is leading an effort to revive Stephen Johnson's
> old "Portable C Compiler". According to the project website
> "The project goal is to write a C99 compiler while still keeping it
> small, simple, fast and understandable.".
I'm not sure one would start with pcc (!)
tcc is basically there. http://bellard.org/tcc/
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.