Re: Parser ambiguity

m.helvensteijn@gmail.com
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:53:35 -0700 (PDT)

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Parser ambiguity m.helvensteijn@gmail.com (2009-03-15)
Re: Parser ambiguity cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2009-03-15)
Re: Parser ambiguity max@gustavus.edu (Max Hailperin) (2009-03-15)
Re: Parser ambiguity m.helvensteijn@gmail.com (2009-03-16)
Re: Parser ambiguity m.helvensteijn@gmail.com (2009-03-16)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: m.helvensteijn@gmail.com
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 09-03-066 09-03-072
Keywords: parse
Posted-Date: 17 Mar 2009 07:09:03 EDT

On Mar 16, 1:34 am, Max Hailperin <m...@gustavus.edu> wrote:


> How about ...


I'm now using a similar solution. The drawback of yours is that I'd
need another detail struct-type to transport the tail-data. On the
other hand, it does have less duplication than mine.


Perhaps I can use precedence declarations instead. I just learned how
from John. Apparently they can be used to solve arbitrary shift/reduce
conflicts. It might be the best of both worlds.


Thanks,


--
Michiel Helvensteijn


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.