|Compiler Tool with Error Recovery firstname.lastname@example.org (Julian Mensch) (2009-02-12)|
|Re: Compiler Tool with Error Recovery email@example.com (2009-02-14)|
|Re: Compiler Tool with Error Recovery firstname.lastname@example.org (Vladimir Makarov) (2009-02-17)|
|Re: Compiler Tool with Error Recovery email@example.com (Johannes) (2009-02-19)|
|Re: Compiler Tool with Error Recovery firstname.lastname@example.org (Julian Mensch) (2009-02-21)|
|Re: Compiler Tool with Error Recovery email@example.com (Bill Cox) (2009-02-25)|
|From:||Bill Cox <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:31:59 -0800|
|Posted-Date:||26 Feb 2009 20:12:14 EST|
> I'd love to hear any suggestions for parsers that meet these
> criteria -- something like Elkhound, except with error recovery,
> would be great.
I recommend ANTLR which is actively mained by Terrence Parr, and
has a very active support group on the mailing list. Go to antlr.org.
There's also a great book The Complete Guide to ANTLR by Prof Parr.
It generates LL(*) parsers, with control over backtracking, which
gives it great expressive power, but less than GLR.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.