Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| From: | "John \"Z-Bo\" Zabroski" <johnzabroski@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers,comp.arch |
| Date: | Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:21:58 -0800 (PST) |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| References: | 08-12-014 |
| Keywords: | architecture, history, comment |
| Posted-Date: | 13 Dec 2008 05:28:52 EST |
On Dec 4, 1:09 pm, "Tony" <t...@my.net> wrote:
> To me, it seems like "reducing everything to a function" may be a bit
> dated given that OO languages are the thing nowadays. Can anyone
> imagine any new potential assembly language instructions that would
> make implemention of OO languages easier? (Not just necessarily the
> function thing, but anything).
Have you read the papers on REKURSIV?
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0470212233/
Hard to find book, but very interesting. Amazon has a new version of
the book through a market place seller for under $50.
Why hasn't it been mentioned yet? Intel 432 was mentioned, but I
thought it was deemed performance inferior to REKURSIV?
[REKURSIV never got beyond a prototype, 432 was shipped as a (not very
successful) product. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.