|TXL ANTLR firstname.lastname@example.org (Anders Karlsson) (2008-08-28)|
|Re: TXL ANTLR Jatin_Bhateja@mentor.com (Jatin Bhateja) (2008-08-29)|
|Re: TXL ANTLR email@example.com (Johannes) (2008-08-30)|
|Re: TXL ANTLR firstname.lastname@example.org (Terence Parr) (2008-08-30)|
|Re: TXL ANTLR email@example.com (ajk) (2008-09-01)|
|Re: TXL ANTLR firstname.lastname@example.org (2008-09-23)|
|Date:||Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:56:59 -0700 (PDT)|
|Posted-Date:||23 Sep 2008 14:15:17 EDT|
On Aug 28, 8:39 am, Anders Karlsson <ander...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was wondering what the difference is between TXL and ANTLR, are
> these similar tools. What other tools are there than can be used for
> help in building compilers besides these and of course LEX/YACC?
> I have looked a bit on ANTLR and it seems quite nice, but was juse
> wondering if there are other alternatives.
[Warning: vendor content ahead. YMMV.]
Semantic Designs offers the DMS Software Reengineering Toolkit.
Provides lexers, parsers, automatic AST construction, control and data
flow analysis machinery, points-to analyzers, surface syntax pattern
matching and pattern instantiation, source-to-source rewrites, and
industrial strength front ends for many lanuages including C, C++,
Java and COBOL.
You can see a comparision of DMS, TXL, ANTLR
and a number of other tools at
Ira Baxter, CTO
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.