.NET compiler

ajk <anders43@gmail.com>
Mon, 15 Sep 2008 18:14:02 -0700 (PDT)

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
.NET compiler anders43@gmail.com (ajk) (2008-09-15)
.NET compiler felipeangriman@gmail.com (Felipe Angriman) (2008-09-16)
Re: .NET compiler sh006d3592@blueyonder.co.uk (Stephen Horne) (2008-09-16)
Re: .NET compiler ang.usenet@gmail.com (Aaron Gray) (2008-09-18)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: ajk <anders43@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 18:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: Compilers Central
Keywords: question
Posted-Date: 16 Sep 2008 07:48:56 EDT

If I was contemplating doing a .NET compiler for a language, would it
be better to generate ILAsm or some other higher-level .NET language?

By creating ILAsm there is more control but I suppose one would have
to put more effort in optimisation. Round-tripping would also work.
Any other benefits of doing ILAsm compared to say C# and then
compiling C# using the std compiler?


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.