|.NET compiler email@example.com (ajk) (2008-09-15)|
|.NET compiler firstname.lastname@example.org (Felipe Angriman) (2008-09-16)|
|Re: .NET compiler email@example.com (Stephen Horne) (2008-09-16)|
|Re: .NET compiler firstname.lastname@example.org (Aaron Gray) (2008-09-18)|
|Date:||Mon, 15 Sep 2008 18:14:02 -0700 (PDT)|
|Posted-Date:||16 Sep 2008 07:48:56 EDT|
If I was contemplating doing a .NET compiler for a language, would it
be better to generate ILAsm or some other higher-level .NET language?
By creating ILAsm there is more control but I suppose one would have
to put more effort in optimisation. Round-tripping would also work.
Any other benefits of doing ILAsm compared to say C# and then
compiling C# using the std compiler?
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.