|TXL ANTLR email@example.com (Anders Karlsson) (2008-08-28)|
|Re: TXL ANTLR Jatin_Bhateja@mentor.com (Jatin Bhateja) (2008-08-29)|
|Re: TXL ANTLR firstname.lastname@example.org (Johannes) (2008-08-30)|
|Re: TXL ANTLR email@example.com (Terence Parr) (2008-08-30)|
|Re: TXL ANTLR firstname.lastname@example.org (ajk) (2008-09-01)|
|Re: TXL ANTLR email@example.com (2008-09-23)|
|Date:||Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:25:42 -0700 (PDT)|
|Posted-Date:||30 Aug 2008 16:36:07 EDT|
On Aug 29, 8:55 am, Jatin Bhateja <Jatin_Bhat...@mentor.com> wrote:
> TXL and ANTLR both have following common features
> * Both are LL(k) parser generators.
That's not quite true. ANTLR is LL(*), meaning it can have an
infinitive lookahead similar to LR parsers. This is done via
generating DFAs for those situations. "The Definitive ANTLR Reference"
contains an in-depth explanation of this technique and is recommend if
you stay with ANTLR.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.