Re:Software Pipelining

Tim Frink <plfriko@yahoo.de>
28 Aug 2008 20:51:35 GMT

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Software Pipelining plfriko@yahoo.de (Tim Frink) (2008-08-26)
Re:Software Pipelining Jatin_Bhateja@mentor.com (Jatin Bhateja) (2008-08-28)
Re:Software Pipelining plfriko@yahoo.de (Tim Frink) (2008-08-28)
Re: Software Pipelining pertti.kellomaki@tut.fi (Pertti Kellomaki) (2008-08-29)
Re: Software Pipelining mr.neeraj@gmail.com (Neeraj Goel) (2008-09-02)
Re: Software Pipelining sidtouati@inria.fr (Touati Sid) (2008-09-08)
Re: Software Pipelining kamalpr@hp.com (kamal) (2008-09-10)
Re: Software Pipelining johnhull2008@gmail.com (johnhull2008) (2008-09-11)
Re: Software Pipelining plfriko@yahoo.de (Tim Frink) (2008-09-16)
[6 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: Tim Frink <plfriko@yahoo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 28 Aug 2008 20:51:35 GMT
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 08-08-072 08-08-086
Keywords: optimize
Posted-Date: 28 Aug 2008 17:36:05 EDT

On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:49:49 +0530, Jatin Bhateja wrote:


> It's a combination of loop unrolling and instruction scheduling. e.g


Thank you, but I know how software pipelining is working. :-)


My question was if also a significant performance increase for RISC
architectures with a restricted number of functional units can be
expected when software pipelining is applied.


And if profiling might be exploited here.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.