Re: Native/VM languages

Marco van de Voort <marcov@stack.nl>
Wed, 27 Aug 2008 07:57:20 +0000 (UTC)

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Native/VM languages borophyll@gmail.com (2008-08-25)
Re: Native/VM languages marcov@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2008-08-27)
Re: Native/VM languages ldv@mail.com (ldv@mail.com) (2008-08-27)
Re: Native/VM languages jeremy.wright@microfocus.com (Jeremy Wright) (2008-08-28)
Re: Native/VM languages gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2008-08-28)
Re: Native/VM languages torbenm@pc-003.diku.dk (2008-08-29)
Re: Native/VM languages cr88192@hotmail.com (cr88192) (2008-08-30)
Re: Native/VM languages gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2008-09-03)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Marco van de Voort <marcov@stack.nl>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 07:57:20 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Stack Usenet News Service
References: 08-08-070
Keywords: VM, interpreter
Posted-Date: 28 Aug 2008 10:03:45 EDT

On 2008-08-26, borophyll@gmail.com <borophyll@gmail.com> wrote:
> The gist of the article is that JITted code will have better
> performance than native code, even C/C++, but gives no figures to
> indicate how much exactly. Does anyone have any solid figures/stats
> on what percentage performance increase can be acheived by JIT code.

Have a look at the great language shootout, and the numbers in its faq:

http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/faq.php#dynamic

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.