Re: ASTs and Type Check Analysis

ArarghMail808@Arargh.com
Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:47:01 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
ASTs and Type Check Analysis crancran@gmail.com (CranCran77) (2008-08-20)
Re: ASTs and Type Check Analysis DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2008-08-24)
Re: ASTs and Type Check Analysis ArarghMail808@Arargh.com (2008-08-24)
Re: ASTs and Type Check Analysis crancran@gmail.com (CranCran77) (2008-08-25)
Re: ASTs and Type Check Analysis bc@freeuk.com (Bartc) (2008-08-25)
Re: ASTs and Type Check Analysis DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2008-08-26)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: ArarghMail808@Arargh.com
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:47:01 -0500
Organization: Ripco Communications Inc.
References: 08-08-044 08-08-054
Keywords: optimize, Basic
Posted-Date: 24 Aug 2008 20:00:42 EDT

On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 01:11:27 +0200, Hans-Peter Diettrich
<DrDiettrich1@aol.com> wrote:


<snip>
>Even Microsoft couldn't find *valid* optimizations for Visual Basic,
>that would result in significantly faster execution of compiled vs.
>interpreted code.


I am not sure that it is possible for any implementation of Basic,
considering the large number of run-time calls.


Most of the optimizations in BCET are because of the lousy code
generator. It was easier to do it that way. :-)
--
ArarghMail808 at [drop the 'http://www.' from ->] http://www.arargh.com
BCET Basic Compiler Page: http://www.arargh.com/basic/index.html

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.