Re: State of the Art

johnhull2008 <johnhull2008@gmail.com>
Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:32:46 -0700 (PDT)

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[4 earlier articles]
Re: State of the Art parrt@cs.usfca.edu (Terence Parr) (2008-07-21)
Re: State of the Art ademakov@gmail.com (Aleksey Demakov) (2008-07-23)
Re: State of the Art cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2008-07-22)
Re: State of the Art torbenm@pc-003.diku.dk (2008-07-23)
Re: State of the Art ang.usenet@gmail.com (Aaron Gray) (2008-07-24)
Re: State of the Art dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2008-07-25)
Re: State of the Art johnhull2008@gmail.com (johnhull2008) (2008-07-28)
Re: State of the Art kamalpr@hp.com (kamal) (2008-07-28)
Re: State of the Art lucky@htsoft.com (Matt Luckman) (2008-07-29)
Re: State of the Art anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2008-08-03)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: johnhull2008 <johnhull2008@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:32:46 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 08-07-033
Keywords: parallel
Posted-Date: 28 Jul 2008 09:48:42 EDT

I think parallelizing compilers (and new languages) for manycore/
multicore are definitely one of the most important current trends or
problems that a lot of people are paying attention to. I also see more
and more people working on program analysis for security.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.