Re: State of the Art

Terence Parr <parrt@cs.usfca.edu>
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:14:36 -0700

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
State of the Art peter.deussen@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Peter) (2008-07-18)
Re: State of the Art jaluber@gmail.com (Johannes) (2008-07-20)
Re: State of the Art DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2008-07-21)
Re: State of the Art peter.deussen@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Peter) (2008-07-21)
Re: State of the Art parrt@cs.usfca.edu (Terence Parr) (2008-07-21)
Re: State of the Art ademakov@gmail.com (Aleksey Demakov) (2008-07-23)
Re: State of the Art cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2008-07-22)
Re: State of the Art torbenm@pc-003.diku.dk (2008-07-23)
Re: State of the Art ang.usenet@gmail.com (Aaron Gray) (2008-07-24)
Re: State of the Art dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2008-07-25)
Re: State of the Art johnhull2008@gmail.com (johnhull2008) (2008-07-28)
[3 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: Terence Parr <parrt@cs.usfca.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:14:36 -0700
Organization: Compilers Central
Keywords: parse, practice
Posted-Date: 21 Jul 2008 18:37:31 EDT

  > I'd prefer PEG, which also establishes a defined order for
ambiguous cases.


ANTLR does this too, but optimizes them to use backtracking only if
LL(*) fails. Turn on backtrack=true and ANTLR does PEG.


Regards,
Terence



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.