|Re: Seeking recommendations for a Visual Parser to replace Visual Pars email@example.com (Marcel Satchell) (2008-03-28)|
|Re: LRgen, was Seeking recommendations for a Visual Parser to replace firstname.lastname@example.org (Paul B Mann) (2008-03-31)|
|Re: LRgen, was Seeking recommendations for a Visual Parser to replace DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2008-04-01)|
|From:||Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com>|
|Date:||Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:32:26 +0200|
|Posted-Date:||02 Apr 2008 00:57:40 EDT|
Paul B Mann wrote:
> The current status for LRGen is:
> "Not enough interest. No feedback. No money. Not worth my time".
> That could change someday, but not likely.
I also have a couple of such projects.
> If anyone has generated more interest in their product by making it
> open source, let me know. Also let me know how to get money for
> working on open source code. Thanks.
Open source does not imply "for free". You can put a project
e.g. under the GPL, or "for evaluation only", to obtain more feedback,
and sell other licenses. I've just started to upload some of my
projects to SourceForge, waiting for response (donations...).
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.