Re: Reordering of functions

glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:12:19 -0800

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Reordering of functions plfriko@yahoo.de (Tim Frink) (2008-02-18)
Re: Reordering of functions nkim@odmsemi.com (Nikolai Kim) (2008-02-18)
Re: Reordering of functions bisqwit@iki.fi (Joel Yliluoma) (2008-02-19)
Re: Reordering of functions cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2008-02-19)
Re: Reordering of functions gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2008-02-20)
Re: Reordering of functions plfriko@yahoo.de (Tim Frink) (2008-02-21)
Re: Reordering of functions plfriko@yahoo.de (Tim Frink) (2008-02-21)
Re: Reordering of functions plfriko@yahoo.de (Tim Frink) (2008-02-21)
Re: Reordering of functions gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2008-02-24)
Re: Reordering of functions cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2008-02-24)
Re: Reordering of functions Jan.Vorbrueggen@thomson.net (=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Jan_Vorbr=FCggen?=) (2008-02-25)
[1 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:12:19 -0800
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 08-02-051 08-02-054
Keywords: optimize
Posted-Date: 24 Feb 2008 00:38:00 EST

Joel Yliluoma wrote:


(snip)


> Aren't "with branch prediction" and "caches are disabled" somewhat
> mutually exclusive statements?


Well, to many people cache unqualified means data or instruction cache.


Note also that there are static branch prediction systems that
don't use a cache at all.


-- glen


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.