Re: Compilers for supercomputing or the opposite ?

Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com>
Sat, 06 Oct 2007 01:19:42 +0200

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Compilers for supercomputing or the opposite ? wenhelt@free.fr (2007-10-05)
Re: Compilers for supercomputing or the opposite ? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-10-06)
Re: Compilers for supercomputing or the opposite ? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2007-10-06)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 01:19:42 +0200
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 07-10-037
Keywords: symbols
Posted-Date: 06 Oct 2007 14:44:02 EDT

wenhelt@free.fr wrote:


> Although compiler code for supercomputing is commonplace,
> supercomputing FOR compilers is coming.
>
> For an EDA (Electronic Design Automation) project, we are facing
> symbol tables over 500 million entries.


IMO you should consider to break down your symbol tables into more handy
pieces, using scopes or whatsoever, or to use binary symbols instead of
named symbols, if the symbol tables are for automatic processing only.


DoDi


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.