Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| Pitfalls in interference graph ? shafitvm@gmail.com (Mohamed Shafi) (2007-09-28) |
| Re: Pitfalls in interference graph ? SidTouati@inria.fr (ST) (2007-10-01) |
| Re: Pitfalls in interference graph ? torbenm@app-1.diku.dk (2007-10-01) |
| Re: Pitfalls in interference graph ? johnl@iecc.com (2007-10-01) |
| Re: Pitfalls in interference graph ? bergner@vnet.ibm.com (Peter Bergner) (2007-10-01) |
| Re: Pitfalls in interference graph ? marcov@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2007-10-01) |
| Re: Pitfalls in interference graph ? rayiner@gmail.com (Rayiner Hashem) (2007-10-01) |
| Re: Pitfalls in interference graph ? rayiner@gmail.com (Rayiner Hashem) (2007-10-01) |
| Re: Pitfalls in interference graph ? jeremy.wright@microfocus.com (Jeremy Wright) (2007-10-02) |
| Re: Pitfalls in interference graph ? shafitvm@gmail.com (shafi) (2007-10-15) |
| Re: Pitfalls in interference graph ? torbenm@app-6.diku.dk (2007-10-17) |
| Re: Pitfalls in interference graph ? SidTouati@inria.fr (ST) (2007-10-18) |
| Re: Pitfalls in interference graph ? rayiner@gmail.com (Rayiner Hashem) (2007-10-21) |
| [2 later articles] |
| From: | Rayiner Hashem <rayiner@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | Mon, 01 Oct 2007 23:48:37 -0700 |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| References: | 07-09-10407-10-007 07-10-010 07-10-017 |
| Keywords: | registers, optimize |
| Posted-Date: | 03 Oct 2007 13:16:14 EDT |
> How do you specify an affinity that is not 100% necessary? Like older i386
> arch CPU's having a preference for EBX as index register ?
I don't know if there are other ways to do this, but there is a 2002
paper called "Preference Directed Graph Coloring", which describes a
systematic way to address this issue, by trying to globally optimize
the fulfillment of register preferences.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.