|Comparison of ANTLR and javacc firstname.lastname@example.org (2007-08-28)|
|Re: Comparison of ANTLR and javacc email@example.com (Tom Copeland) (2007-08-29)|
|Re: Comparison of ANTLR and javacc firstname.lastname@example.org (2007-09-06)|
|From:||Tom Copeland <email@example.com>|
|Date:||Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:20:44 -0400|
|Keywords:||Java, tools, parse|
|Posted-Date:||29 Aug 2007 22:08:20 EDT|
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 18:59 +0000, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> Can anyone point me to a recent comparison of ANTLR and javacc? What
> are each of them more/less useful for?
ANTLR has an edge over JavaCC in that it can produce parser source
code in various languages, whereas JavaCC is limited to producing
parsers in Java.
That said, JavaCC+JJTree provides a fine solution for projects that
can use a parser in Java, and there are lots of example JavaCC
grammars out there to learn from.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.