Re: parsing ISO C++(1998/2003)

"Aaron Gray" <ang.usenet@gmail.com>
23 Apr 2007 07:50:24 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
parsing ISO C++(1998/2003) parthaspanda2005@yahoo.com (2007-04-14)
Re: parsing ISO C++(1998/2003) ang.usenet@gmail.com (Aaron Gray) (2007-04-18)
Re: parsing ISO C++(1998/2003) parthaspanda2005@yahoo.com (2007-04-19)
Re: parsing ISO C++(1998/2003) ang.usenet@gmail.com (Aaron Gray) (2007-04-23)
Re: parsing ISO C++(1998/2003) haberg@math.su.se (2007-04-23)
Re: parsing ISO C++(1998/2003) idbaxter@semdesigns.com (Ira Baxter) (2007-04-26)
Re: parsing ISO C++(1998/2003) torbenm@app-7.diku.dk (2007-04-26)
Re: parsing ISO C++(1998/2003) ang.usenet@gmail.com (Aaron Gray) (2007-04-27)
Re: parsing ISO C++(1998/2003) ang.usenet@gmail.com (Aaron Gray) (2007-04-27)
Re: parsing ISO C++(1998/2003) idbaxter@semdesigns.com (Ira Baxter) (2007-04-28)
[2 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Aaron Gray" <ang.usenet@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 23 Apr 2007 07:50:24 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 07-04-05207-04-059 07-04-069
Keywords: C++, parse, tools
Posted-Date: 23 Apr 2007 07:50:24 EDT

<parthaspanda2005@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:07-04-069@comp.compilers...
> On Apr 18, 10:46 pm, "Aaron Gray" <ang.use...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> <parthaspanda2...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> GLR (Bison has GLR) was ment to be the answer, although it is slow
>> compared
>> to other techniques.
>>
>> Elkhound and Elsa tried GLR approach and failed.
>
> Did Bison(GLR) succeed? I mean has anyone reported it as having
> worked?


I am not sure about Bison. I believe that it works though, have not heard
anthing to contradict that belief.


> As a side note, I notice Bison(2.3) as not being able to dump
> statistics of GLR specifics(merged RHS for e.g.).


Dumping stats is not really necessary.


What would be a good tool is something that takes an ambiguous grammar an
generates a GLR grammar. I am not sure whether this problem is decidable or
not though.


Aaron


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.