| Related articles |
|---|
| Using functional notation to extend BNF zzq@hvc.rr.com (Bill Fenlason) (2007-01-08) |
| Re: Using functional notation to extend BNF danwang74@gmail.com (Daniel C. Wang) (2007-01-09) |
| Re: Using functional notation to extend BNF roar.foshaug@systor.st (Roar) (2007-01-09) |
| Re: Using functional notation to extend BNF RLake@Oxfam.org.uk (2007-01-15) |
| From: | "Daniel C. Wang" <danwang74@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 9 Jan 2007 13:29:45 -0500 |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| References: | 07-01-025 |
| Keywords: | parse |
| Posted-Date: | 09 Jan 2007 13:29:45 EST |
Bill Fenlason wrote:
{stuff deleted}
> Interesting, or just old news?
What you've describe seems like a form of vW-grammar.
http://homepages.cwi.nl/~steven/vw.html
General vW-grammars are context sensitive if I'm not mistaken.
vW-grammar's were used to define the semantics of Algol-68.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.