Re: HLL design

Hans-Peter Diettrich <>
26 Oct 2006 00:29:19 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[6 earlier articles]
Re: HLL design (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-10-21)
Re: HLL design (fermineutron) (2006-10-21)
Re: HLL design (Daniel C. Wang) (2006-10-24)
Re: HLL design ( (2006-10-24)
Re: HLL design (Bjarke Walling) (2006-10-24)
Re: HLL design (DavidM) (2006-10-24)
Re: HLL design (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-10-26)
Re: HLL design (Bjarke Walling) (2006-10-28)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: Hans-Peter Diettrich <>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 26 Oct 2006 00:29:19 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 06-10-08006-10-089 06-10-104
Keywords: design, translator
Posted-Date: 26 Oct 2006 00:29:19 EDT

Bjarke Walling wrote:

> * My language is more or less independant of the architecture and
> platform if I stick to the C standard. Ie. you can use another C
> compiler to compile for your specific platform.

More less, I think. If your language allows for filehandling and other
OS specific features, your libraries are more important than the
compiler, with regards to portability.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.