Re: Preview in grammar

Marco van de Voort <marcov@stack.nl>
4 May 2006 10:46:28 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Preview in grammar franku@fmi.uni-passau.de (Ulrich Frank) (2006-05-03)
Re: Preview in grammar marcov@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2006-05-04)
Re: Preview in grammar haberg@math.su.se (2006-05-04)
Re: Preview in grammar pbmann@gmail.com (2006-05-09)
Re: Preview in grammar haberg@math.su.se (2006-05-09)
Re: Preview in grammar DrDiettrich@compuserve.de (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-05-09)
Re: Preview in grammar franku@fmi.uni-passau.de (Ulrich Frank) (2006-05-09)
Re: Preview in grammar cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2006-05-11)
[8 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Marco van de Voort <marcov@stack.nl>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 4 May 2006 10:46:28 -0400
Organization: Stack Usenet News Service
References: 06-05-011
Keywords: parse
Posted-Date: 04 May 2006 10:46:28 EDT

On 2006-05-04, Ulrich Frank <franku@fmi.uni-passau.de> wrote:
>
> Of course a LALR parser would be better because the grammar can be
> written down in an easier way.


Of course you will spend twice the time in rearranging the grammar later to
avoid getting horribly cryptic error msgs :)


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.