Re: dynamic precedence, was Dangling else

Alex Colvin <alexc@TheWorld.com>
14 Mar 2006 00:48:41 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Re: Dangling else wyrmwif@tsoft.org (SM Ryan) (2006-02-24)
Re: Dangling else rsc@swtch.com (Russ Cox) (2006-02-24)
Re: Dangling else Brian.Inglis@SystematicSW.ab.ca (Brian Inglis) (2006-03-11)
Re: dynamic precedence, was Dangling else cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2006-03-12)
Re: dynamic precedence, was Dangling else alexc@TheWorld.com (Alex Colvin) (2006-03-14)
Re: dynamic precedence, was Dangling else torbenm@app-4.diku.dk (2006-03-14)
Re: dynamic precedence, was Dangling else dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2006-03-15)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: Alex Colvin <alexc@TheWorld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 14 Mar 2006 00:48:41 -0500
Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
References: 06-02-154 06-02-168 06-03-024 06-03-038
Keywords: parse
Posted-Date: 14 Mar 2006 00:48:41 EST

>I can't remember which languages (besides A68) allowed one to modify
>the precedence of operators, however there must have been a few,


Prolog, I believe.
--
mac the naf



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.