Re: Back end generator alternatives?

Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
31 Jan 2006 00:34:13 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Back end generator alternatives? mr.waverlye@verizon.net (Mr.E) (2006-01-26)
Re: Back end generator alternatives? nkavv@skiathos.physics.auth.gr (Uncle Noah) (2006-01-28)
Re: Back end generator alternatives? vmakarov@redhat.com (Vladimir Makarov) (2006-01-31)
Re: Back end generator alternatives? emmel@h-e-i.de (Helmut Emmelmann) (2006-01-31)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 31 Jan 2006 00:34:13 -0500
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
References: 06-01-083
Keywords: code, tools
Posted-Date: 31 Jan 2006 00:34:13 EST

Mr.E wrote:
> Are there good back end generator outside of BEG. I done some research
> and have been only able to find a few which are:
>
> Burg, New Jersey Machine-Code Toolkit and some company in France that I
> cant recall (possibly PAGODE?).
>


You could use NONA which is part of COCOM toolset http://cocom.sf.net


Its description can be found on http://cocom.sourceforge.net/nona.html


IMHO, it is more flexible than IBURG plus it can work on DAG not only
on trees. It was used in serious projects like extended Pascal
cross-compiler implementation.


COCOM itself is distributed under GPL.

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.