|Copying GC and finalization firstname.lastname@example.org (Julian Stecklina) (2005-07-26)|
|Re: Copying GC and finalization email@example.com (Chris Cheney) (2005-07-28)|
|Re: Copying GC and finalization firstname.lastname@example.org (Florian Liekweg) (2005-07-28)|
|Re: Copying GC and finalization email@example.com (Julian Stecklina) (2005-08-05)|
|Re: Copying GC and finalization firstname.lastname@example.org (Eliot Miranda) (2005-08-21)|
|Re: Copying GC and finalization email@example.com (Julian Stecklina) (2005-08-24)|
|From:||Florian Liekweg <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||28 Jul 2005 02:39:05 -0400|
|Organization:||University of Karlsruhe, Germany|
|Posted-Date:||28 Jul 2005 02:39:05 EDT|
Julian Stecklina wrote:
> I am quite puzzled on how
> to implement this without losing the nice property of copying garbage
> collectors that there is nothing to do for objects that have become
Well, with finalisation, you have to do *something* to those objects,
> If anyone can point me to some information, it would be very helpful.
I remember seeing a good article on that issue by Hans-J. Boehm of HP.
Start at http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc/finalization.html,
and see the POPL2003 paper "Destructors, Finalizers, and Synchronization"
by the same author.
Florian Liekweg | We resisted the temptation to develop what
IPD Universitšt Karlsruhe | the market needed at the time.
========================================[ Rich Seifert on Ethernet ]===
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.